با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن علمی مدیریت ورزشی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه زابل

چکیده

هدف: هدف این پژوهش مقایسه سواد اطلاعاتی در بین دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد تربیت بدنی در منطقه جنوب شرق است.
روش پژوهش: این پژوهش از نوع توصیفی مقایسه ای است که به شکل میدانی انجام گرفت. اطلاعات توسط پرسش نامه محقق ساخته با پایایی آلفای کرونباخ مقدار 92/0 بدست آمد. جامعه آماری 150 نفر از دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه های بیرجند، مشهد و کرمان به صورت نمونه گیری تصادفی طبقه ای به عنوان نمونه پژوهش انتخاب شدند، جهت تجزیه و تحلیل یافته ها ازآمارتوصیفی فراوانی و آمار استنباطی استفاده شد.
یافته ها: یافته های پژوهش نشان داد میانگین سطح سواد اطلاعاتی دانشجویان دانشگاه ها بیرجنْد، کرمان و مشهد تفاوت معنی داری در مقطع ارشد با یکدیگر ندارند، و در مقایسه بین سه گرایش مدیریت و رفتار حرکتی و فیزیولوژی ورزشی نیز تفاوت معنی داری بدست نیامد، همچنین اختلاف معنی داری بین جنسیت و سطح سواد آماری پیدا نشد. ولی دانشجویان از لحاظ سواد اطلاعاتی در سطح متوسطی رو به پایین قرار دارند.
نتیجه گیری: میانگین پاسخ ها برای شاخص شناخت (سواد اطلاعاتی از دیدگاه شناخت) برای کل دانشجویان 01/3 و برای شاخص استفاده (سواد اطلاعاتی از دیدگاه استفاده) 92/2 که شاخص شناخت عدد متوسط رو به بالایی بوده ولی شاخص استفاده عدد پایینی است می توان نتیجه گرفت دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد تربیت بدنی از نظر سطح سواد اطلاعاتی در سطح متوسطی قرار دارند

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Study of the Information literacy level in the Post Graduated Physical Education Student in South East Region

نویسنده [English]

  • Mohsen Ahmadi

Associated Professor of Sport Management, Zabol University

چکیده [English]

Objective: The purpose of this research compare information literacy among post graduated physical education student in south east region.
Methodology: this is a descriptive compare study that was in field. The information was collected by self-questioner made and reliability by used of alpha cronbakh 92 percent. The population was 150 post graduate student from birjand, Mashhad, Kerman selected in stratified random sample. For analysis data was used descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results: results showed there was no meaning different between information literacy among postgraduate university, in addition there were no meaning different among academic orientation in sport physiology, motor behavior and sport management, so, there is no meaning different between sex and information literacy.
Conclusion: Average response for cognitive index (information literacy in cognitive viewpoint) for all student 3/01and for use index (information literacy in use viewpoint) 2/92 that cognitive index was average and upward and use index down, then the postgraduate student in physical education had average level information literacy

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Information Literacy
  • Physical Education Student
  • South East University
  1. Afsharnjad, h., Habbi, s,.   Gadri pakdel, f. (2005). InformationLiteracy senior students of Razi University in Kermanshah. Systems and information services, Health Information Management, The fourth period, the first year, the first issue,page 20. (In Persian)
  2. Bahadorani,m., Bamani,n. (2002). Knowledgeattitude and practice of faculty members about the use of computers and Internet networks in Amramvzsh in Isfahan. University of Medical Sciences,Journal of Medical Education, Special Issue 34-33
  3. Brodshaw,k. (2001). nternet search: the use of internet among faculty at Utah state university: a demographics analysis. ms,mai,40/50
  4. Chen, C,Y,. (2004). An examination of the competencies needed by sport managers in Taiwan. unpublished doctoral dissertation, university of Idaho
  5. Chizari,M., Movahed, H.,& Linder,J,R. (2003). The role of internet in educational activities of graduated students at Tehran university. Collage of agriculture, proceedings of the 19th annual conference Raleigh, north Carolina, usa,8-12.pp:126-134. (In Persian)
  6. Davarpanh,S. , marzeh, m,.(1388). Construct and validate a questionnaire of true information literacy and undergraduate students., Journal of Library and Information, 224-199,45)12. (In Persian)
  7. Davis,F.,bagozzi,R,. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science.35,(8):982-1003
  8. Kocak,S,. (2003). Computer attitude and competencies in physical education and sport, Journal of the international council for health, physical education recreation, Sport, and dance, 39,(1)pp:49-52
  9. Lambrecht,K,W,.(1987). An analysis of the competencies of sports and athletics clubmanagers.,Journals of sport management,1,(2),pp:116-128
  10. Mohmadi,S., Esmali,N.,galaleh,A,.(1389). Review of the familiarity and importance of computers in the organization of sports, fitness      and aerobics International Conference,Tehran, (In Persian)
  11. Moody,J., stewarts,B.,&Bolet Lee,C,. (2002). Show casing the skilled business graduate: Expanding the tool kit,Businse communication quarterly,65(1).pp:21-36
  12. Mattews,G,C.,Benbasat,I,. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure the perception of adopting an information system research .2(3),pp:192-222
  13. Fergosen, S,. (2004). the development of the standards for quality evaluation of the web-based courses., Modern educational technology( in Chinese),1,5-11
  14. Hasanzadeh, R., Asadi, MH,.(1389). The impact of information literacy instruction on students' academic performance. Journal of research, Journal of Education,(11)11. (In Persian)
  15. Miri, E., Cheshmehsohrabi, M., .(1387). Checkinformation literacy undergraduate senior students of Arak‌ University of Science and Technology in the digital environment, Knowledge,76-65,(13) 4. (In Persian)
  16. Nasiri,B. (1391). Media literacy educationi Canada and Japan. Educational innovations. 160-137,(41)11
  17. Pandpazir,M, Cheshmehsohrabi, M., .(1389). Study of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences Based on information literacy graduate students Six big skills Eisenberg Vbrkvytz. (In Persian)
  18. mehri, P.,  Arsto,Sh., nadri,MA .(1390). The effectiveness of information literacy workshops for graduate students with field-oriented approach. , Journal of Library and Information224_2:20(In Persian).
  19. Qasmi ،A, . (1385). Check the status of graduate students information literacy and information literacy standards compliance, PhD thesis Librarian, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (In Persian)
  20. Qasmi, A., Davarpanah, M H. (1386). Standardization of informationliteracy competency standards for academic community in Iran. Journal of Education and Psychology, Volume III, Issue 8. (In Persian)
  21. Rastgo,a.(1389).The effect of the Interneton the development of information literacy education students problem-solving skills., New Approaches in Educational Administration,22-1,(4). (In Persian)
  22. Safri, V., gafori, S. (1390). Information Literacy senior students of Razi University in Kermanshah. Systems and information services, Journal of Systems and information services, 95-108(1).( In Persian)