نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، علی‌آبادکتول، ایران
2 استادیار گروه تربیت‌بدنی و علوم ورزشی، واحد علی‌آباد کتول، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، علی‌آباد کتول، ایران( نویسندة مسئول)
3 استادیار گروه تربیت‌بدنی و علوم ورزشی، واحد علی‌آباد کتول، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، علی‌آباد کتول، ایران
4 استادیار دانشگاه زنجان - استادیار مدیریت ورزشی،گروه علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه زنجان
5 استادیار گروه تربیت‌بدنی و علوم ورزشی، واحد ساوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساوه، ایران
چکیده
هدف از پژوهش حاضر طراحی مدل مهارت های ارتباطی بازخورد شغلی ، قدرت منبع بازخورد و عزت دریافت کننده در بهبود عملکرد شغلی کارشناسان تربیت بدنی دانشگاه های پیام نور بود. پژوهش حاضر بر مبنای هدف از نوع کاربردی و از نوع توصیفی و همبستگی بود که به شکل میدانی انجام شد. جامعة آماری شامل کارشناسان تربیت بدنی دانشگاه های پیام نور(468 نفر) بود که 248 نفر به روش تصادفی طبقه ای به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شد.ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات شامل چهار پرسشنامه عزت نفس سازمانی پیرس و همکاران (1989)، بازخورد شغلی آلدرز(2000)، قدرت منبع بازخورد هینکین و اسچریشیم (1989) و عملکرد شغلی فدور و همکاران(2001) بود. پایایی پرسشنامه ها بالای 75/0 بود . از آمار توصیفی برای توصیف داده‌ها و در بخش استنباطی از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون ، تحلیل مسیر و روش معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد بازخورد شغلی بر بهبود عملکرد شغلی، قدرت منبع بازخورد وعزت دریافت کننده ، تأثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد. قدرت منبع بازخورد بر بهبود عملکرد شغلی و همچنین عزت دریافت کننده نیز بر بهبود عملکرد شغلی، تأثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد. قدرت منبع بازخورد و عزت دریافت کننده بازخورد در رابطة بازخورد شغلی و بهبود عملکرد شغلی، نقش میانجی دارد. بنابراین با توجه به تاثیر معناداری تمامی متغیرهای مربوط به مهارت های ارتباطی بر روی بهبود عملکرد شغلی، وبا توجه لازم به عوامل روانی(عزت نفس) و سازمانی (قدرت منبع) بازخورد شغلی ، ضمن اثربخش نمودن و افزایش احتمال پذیرش بازخورد ، می توان عملکرد شغلی کارشناسان تربیت بدنی دانشگاه را بهبود بخشید.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Designing a communication skills model of job feedback, the power of the source of feedback and the dignity of the recipient in improving the job performance of physical education experts of Payame Noor universities
نویسندگان [English]
- ali khasseh 1
- akram esfahaninia 2
- saeid ghorbani 3
- hassan gharehkhani 4
- mona rezaee 5
1 Ph.D. Student of Sport management, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran.
4 Assistant Professor, University of zanjan, Assistant Professor of Sports management, Department of Sport Sciences, zanjan University, Iran.
5 Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, saveh Branch, Islamic Azad University, saveh, Iran.
چکیده [English]
The aim of the present study was to design a model of job feedback communication skills, power of feedback source and recipient dignity in improving the job performance of physical education experts of Payame Noor universities. The aim of the present study was applied and descriptive-correlational, which was conducted in the field. The statistical population included physical education experts of Payame Noor universities (468 people) of whom 248 people were selected by stratified random sampling. Data collection tools included Pierce organizational self-esteem questionnaire (1989), Alders job feedback (2000), feedback source power Hinkin (1989) and Fedor (2001). The reliability of the questionnaires was above 0.75. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the data and in the inferential section Pearson correlation coefficient, path analysis and structural equation method were used. The results showed that job feedback has a positive and significant effect on improving job performance, source of feedback strength and recipient dignity. The power of the source of feedback and the dignity of the recipient, on the improvement of job performance, the positive effect and meaning of the drug The power of the source of feedback and the dignity of the recipient of feedback play a mediating role in the relationship between job feedback and improving job performance.Therefore, considering the significant effect of variables related to communication skills on job performance, and according to psychological (self-esteem) and organizational factors (resource power) job feedback, effectiveness and increase the likelihood of accepting feedback, the job performance of physical education experts can be Improved.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Communication skills
- Job feedback
- Feedback power
- Feedback dignity
- Job performance
2. Alam, M., & Singh, P. (2019). Performance feedback interviews as affective events: An exploration of the impact of emotion regulation of negative performance feedback on supervisor–employee dyads. Human Resource Management Review, 100740.
3. Alders, M. L. (2000). The influence of goal orientation on employee response to performance feedback: Making organizational feedback system more effective (Unpublished doctoral Dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
4. Dahling, J., O’Malley, A., & Chau, S. (2015). Effects of feedback motives on inquiry and performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(2), 199–215.
5. Datong, C. I., Chavez, N. H., Pamplona, M. A. I., & Camilla, N. C. (2017). Employers’ feedback on job performance of engineering graduates in one private academic institution in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 4(1), 34-40.
6. Day, D. V., & Gregory, J. L. (2017). Mindfulness as a prerequisite to effective leadership: Exploring the constructs that foster productive use of feedback for
professional learning. Interchange, 48(4), 363-375.
7. Dimotakis, N., Mitchell, D., & Maurer, T. (2017). Positive and negative assessment center feedback in relation to development self-efficacy, feedback seeking, and promotion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(11), 1514-1527.
8. Elicker, J. D., Cubrich, M., Chen, J. M., de Luque, M. F. S., & Shemueli, R. G. (2019). Employee reactions to the feedback environment. In Feedback at work (pp. 175-194). Cham: Springer.
9. Eva, N., Meacham, H., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., & Tham, T. L. (2019). Is coworker feedback more important than supervisor feedback for increasing innovative behavior? Human Resource Management, 58(4), 383-396.
10. Fedor, D. B., Davis, W. D., Maslyn, J. M., & Mathieson, K. (2001). Performance improvement efforts in response to negative feedback: The roles of source power and recipient self-esteem. Journal of Management, 27(1), 79-97.
11. Gardner, D. G. (2020). The importance of being resilient: Psychological well-being, job autonomy, and self-esteem of organization managers. Personality and Individual Differences, 155, 109731.
12. Geraghty, S. (2017). Types and sources of Feedback in the Workplace. Retrieved from https://www. talkdesk.com.
13. Guo, Y., Xiong, G., Zhang, Z., Tao, J., & Deng, C. (2020). Effects of supervisor’s developmental feedback on employee loyalty: A moderated mediation model. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 48(1), 1-14.
14. Gutierrez M, M. (2018). Characteristics, manage-rial skills and job performance of women middle managers in Central Luzon (Region III). Philippines International Journal of Human Resources Management, 6(9), 2319-2336.
15. Hensell, H. (2020). The impact of rise model for peer feedback training, implementation, and adoption by faculty on faculty job satisfaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gwynedd Mercy University, Philadelphia.
16. Hinkin, T. R., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1989). Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 561–567.
17. Karkoulian S, Guy, A, Rob, H, (2016). An empirical study of 360-degree feedback, organizational justice, and firm sustainability. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1862-1867.
18. Keshavarz, L., Farahani, A., & Daneshmandi, H. (2015). Determining the strategic position and formulating the strategic plan of the Gymnastics Federation Islamic Republic of Iran. Strategic Studies on Youth and Sports, 15(32), 75-92. (Persian)
19. Kille, D. R., Eibach, R. P., Wood, J. V., & Holmes, J. G. (2017). Who can’t take a compliment? The role of construal level and self-esteem in accepting positive feedback from close others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 40-49.
20. Kim, E., Rhee, M. (2017). How airlines learn from airline accidents: An empirical study of how attributed errors and performance feedback affect learning from failure. Journal of Air Transport Management, 58, 135-143.
21. Kuykendall, L., Craig, L., & Tay, L. (2020). Work‐ contingent self‐esteem: A boon or bane for worker well‐ being? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(1), 1-16.
22. London, M. (2014). The power of feedback: Giving, seeking, and using feedback for performance improvement. London: Routledge.
23. Masomi, H. (208). Performance management in sports organizations. Tehran: Elm-o-Adab. (Persian)
24. Mohammadi, L., Honari, H., & Afshari, M. (2017). Evaluate the performance of sports federations based on the quality management foundation index Europe: A Case Study of the Sailing Federation. Journal of Sports Management Studies, 35, 163-182. (Persian)
25. Nazari, R., & Mousavizadeh, F. (2018). The effect of psychosocial skills on communication skills and social capital of sport managers. presentation of the effect of psychological skills on communication skills and social capital of sport managers. Communication Management in Sports Media, 5(20), 15-28. (Persian)
26. Nicaise, V., Bois, J. E., Fairclough, S. J., Amorose, A. J., & Cogerino, G. (2017). Girls’ and boys’ perceptions of physical education teacher’s feedback: Effects on performance and psychological responses. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(8), 915-926.
27. Parisi, G. I. J., & Tani Cornelius, W, S, W. (2015). Lifelong learning of human actions with deep neural network self-organization. Neural Networks, 96(3),137-149.
28. Pierce, J. L., Dunhum, R. B., & Cummings, L. L. (1993). Moderation by organization based Self-esteem of role condition employee response relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 2, 271288.
29. Outirba, A. B., Hendrick, B. P., & Nicolas, C. K. (2017). Experimental characterization of carbon fibre brush seal leakage performance as a function of bristle pack geometrical parameters under dry conditions. The Aeronautical Journal, 121(1245), 1627-1647.
30. Rahnavard, F. (2009). Factors affecting the performance of Iranian public sector organizations. Journal of Executive Management, 8(31), 77-100. (Persian)
31. Renn, R. W., & Fedor, D. B. (2001). Development and field test of a feedback seeking, self-efficacy, and goal setting model of work performance. Journal of Management, 27(5), 563-583.
32. Russ, C. L., Vonaş, G., & Băban, A. (2010). An analysis of environmental changes, resources and performance: An internal police organization perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(33), 727-734.
33. Son, S., & Kim, D. Y. (2015). The role of perceived feedback sources’ learning-goal orientation on feedback acceptance and employees’ creativity. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(1), 82-95.
34. Song, M., Gok, K., Moss, S., & Borkowski, N. (2020). The relationship between perceived dissimilarity and feedback avoidance behaviour. International Journal of Conflict Management, 32(1), 1-19.
35. Wang, M., Burlacu, G., Trujillo, D., James, K., & Yao, X. (2015). Age differences in feedback reactions: The roles of employee feedback orientation on social awareness and utility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1296-1308.
36. Yang, Y., Lee, P. & Cheng, T.C. (2016). Continuous improvement competence, employee creativity, and new service development performance: A frontline employee perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 171(2), 275288.
)