مدیریت ارتباطات در رسانه های ورزشی

با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن علمی مدیریت ورزشی ایران

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

کارکرد رسانه‌های اجتماعی در طرفداری ورزشی: کاوشی در دیدگاه‌های طرفداران بعد از ال‌کلاسیکو

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران

2 استادیار گروه علوم ورزشی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران

3 کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

چکیده

امروزه با توسعه رسانه‌های اجتماعی، گرایش طرفداران به بیان عقاید و نظرات خود بیشتر از پیش می‌شود. از سویی، با ظهور رسانه‌های اجتماعی طی دهه گذشته سرعت و محدوده ارتباطات و تعامل بین افراد و سازمان‌ها در سراسر دنیا تغییر کرده است. ازاین‌رو هدف تحقیق حاضر بررسی مصرف رسانه‌ای و رفتار آنلاین طرفداران ورزشی بعد از بازی ال‌کلاسیکو با استفاده از روش تحلیل محتوا بود. در این پژوهش یکی از پست‌های صفحه رسمی لالیگا در فیس‌بوک بعد از بازی (بارسلونا-رئال مادرید موسوم به ال‌کلاسیکو فصل 18-2017) به‌صورت هدفمند جهت بررسی دیدگاه‌های کاربران مورد انتخاب قرار گرفت. ویژگی‌های فیس‌بوک در سه دسته کلی؛ بارگذاری محتوا، مرور محتوا توسط دیگر کاربران و واکنش‌های کاربران نسبت به محتوا طبقه‌بندی ‌شد. پس از کدگذاری، 10 طبقه شامل «اشاره به بازی، اشاره به فرد، اشاره به تیم، کلام تهاجمی، شوخی با انتقاد، سرزنش کردن، اشاره به طرفدار، استفاده از ضمایر ما و آن‌ها، هیجان فوتبالی و تعامل» به دست آمد. در نهایت یافته­ های پژوهش نشان داد، تقریباً 57 درصد از مصرف رسانه‌ای در رسانه‌های اجتماعی ورزشی به اشتراک‌گذاری منتهی می‌شود. مسئله هویت‌ سازی با تقریباً 30 درصد کدها دومین کارکرد رسانه‌های اجتماعی در ورزش می‌تواند باشد. درعین‌حال گفتگوها با 2.6 درصد فراوانی کمترین میزان کارکرد را در این پژوهش داشته‌اند. باید توجه داشت که در حوزه ورزش علت شکل‌گیری رفتار به اشکال مختلف مانند اشاره به بازی، اشاره به فرد و حتی کلام تهاجمی در اثر علاقه‌ای است که طرفدار به باشگاه، تیم و شهر خود دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Functions of Social Media in Sport Fanatic: Explore the Comments after the El Clasico Fans

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahdi Latifi Fard 1
  • Marjan Saffari 2
  • Kolsoum Heidari 3

1 Ph.D. Student of Sport Management, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran

2 Assistant Professor Department of Sport Science, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran

3 Masters of Sport Management, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

چکیده [English]

With the development of social media in this echo, Sports Fans have intended to express opinions more than before. In other hand, the purpose of the present study was the analysis of media consumption and online behavior of sports fan after El Clasico that implemented with the content analysis method. One of the status of the official Facebook page for La Liga selected Purposive sampling after first leg between FC Barcelona and Real Madrid C.F., nominated as El Clasico, 2017-18 season to investigate fans comments. Facebook features are categorized into items associated with uploading content, reviewing content uploaded by others in the network, and items related to responses to content. Finally, findings showed roughly 57 percent of social media consumption in sport end up sharing. The second function of social media in sport can be identifying with 30 percent codes. While conversations had least frequency codes 2.6 percent. Communication and reputation block haven’t dedicated any category. After coding, 10 categories came up include “reference to match, reference to individual, reference to team, offensive language, kidding with critique, blaming, reference to fan, use we and they, football emotions and interactivity”. Should noticed that the reason of forming behavior into different format such reference to match, reference to individual, and even offensive language in sport area is fan passion to club, team and city.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Football Fans
  • Social Media
  • Media Consumption
  • El Clasico
  • Sport
مراجع
References
1.Aaker, D. (2010). Marketing challenges in the next decade. Journal of Brand Management, 17, 315–316.
2.Anagnostopoulos, C., Parganas, P., Fenton, A., & Chadwick, S. M. (2017). Branding in pictures: using Instagram as a brand management tool in professional team sport organisations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 18(5), 1-26
3.Araújo, N., de Carlos, P., & Antonio Fraiz, J. (2014). Top European football clubs and social networks: a true 2.0 relationship? Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 4(3), 250-264.
4.Armstrong, C. G. Delia, E. B., & Giardina, M. D. (2016). Embracing the social in social media: An analysis of the social media marketing strategies of the Los Angeles Kings. Communication & Sport, 4(2), 145-165.
5.Bennett CC (1967) what price privacy? American Psychologist 22: 371–376.
6.Boehmer, J. (2016). Does the game really change? How students consume mediated sports in the age of social media. Communication & Sport, 4(4), 460-483.
7.Butler, B., & Sagas, M. (2008). Making room in the lineup: Newspaper Web sites face growing competition for sports fans’ attention. International Journal of Sport Communication, 1(1), 17-25.
8.Castro-Ramos, E. (2008). Loyalties, commodity and fandom: Real Madrid, Barça and Athletic fans versus ‘La Furia Roja’ during the World Cup. Sport in Society, 11(6), 696–710.
9.Clavio, G. (2013). Emerging social media and applications in sport. In P. Pedersen (Ed.), Handbook of sport communication (259–268). New York, NY: Routledge.
10.Cohen, G. L., & Garcia, J. (2005). I am us: negative stereotypes as collective threats. Journal of personality and social psychology, 89(4), 566-582.
11.Cromwell, G. (2009, August 26). Armstrong’s tweet turns out more than 1,000 riders for a jaunt around Dublin. VeloNews. Retrieved August 26, 2009, from http://www.velonews. Com/article/97144/armstrong-s-tweet-turns-out-more-than-1000-riders-for-a
12.DeSarbo, W. S., & Madrigal, R. (2011). Examining the behavioral manifestations of fan avidity in sports marketing. Journal of Modelling in Management, 6(1), 79-99.
13.Farred, G. (2002). Long distance love: Growing up a Liverpool Football Club fan. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 26(1), 6-24.
14.Filo, K., Lock, D., & Karg, A. (2015). Sport and social media research: A review. Sport Management Review, 18(2), 166–181.
15.Fink, J. S., Parker, H. M., Brett, M., & Higgins, J. (2009). Off-field behavior of athletes and team identification: Using social identity theory and balance theory to explain fan reactions. Journal of Sport Management, 23(2), 142-155.
16.Fulconis, F., & Pache, G. (2014). Football passion as a religion: the four dimensions of a sacred experience. Society and Business Review, 9(2), 166-185.
17.Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
18.Gil-Lopez, T., Ahmed, S., & Taylor, L. D. (2017). Understanding Fandom in the Multilingual Internet: A Study of “El Clásico” Fans’ Commenting Behavior on YouTube. International Journal of Sport Communication, 10(1), 17-33.
19.Guschwan, M. (2016). New media: online fandom. Soccer & Society, 17(3), 351-371.
20.Hambrick, M. E., & Svensson, P. G. (2015). Gainline Africa: A case study of sport-fordevelopment organizations and the role of organizational relationship building via social media. International Journal of Sport Communication, 8(2), 233–254.
21.Hambrick, M. E., Simmons, J. M., Greenhalgh, G. P., & Greenwell, T. C. (2010). Understanding professional athletes’ use of Twitter: A content analysis of athlete tweets. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3(4), 454-471.
22.Hur, Y., KO, Y. J., & Valacich, J. (2007). Motivation and concerns for online sport consumption. Journal of Sport Management, 21(4), 521-539.
23.Hutchins, B. (2016). ‘We don’t need no stinking smartphones!’Live stadium sports events, mediatization, and the non-use of mobile media. Media, Culture & Society, 38(3), 420-436.
24.Ioakimidis, M. (2010). Online marketing of professional sport clubs: Engaging fans on a new playing field. International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship, 12, 271–282.
25.Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. nyu Press.
26.Keaton, S. A., & Gearhart, C. C. (2014). Identity formation, identity strength, and self-categorization as predictors of affective and psychological outcomes: A model reflecting sport team fans’ responses to highlights and lowlights of a college football season. Communication & Sport, 2(4), 363-385.
27.Kerr, A. (2008). Team identification and satellite supporters: the potential value of brand equity frameworks.
28.Kerr, A. K., & Emery, P. R. (2011). Foreign fandom and the Liverpool FC: a cyber-mediated romance. Soccer & Society, 12(6), 880-896.
29.Kerr, A. K., & Gladden, J. M. (2008). Extending the understanding of professional team brand equity to the global marketplace. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 3(1-2), 58-77.
30.Laverie, D. A., & Arnett, D. B. (2000). Factors affecting fan attendance: The influence of identity salience and satisfaction. Journal of leisure Research, 32(2), 225-246.
31.Nayyeri, Sh; Saffari, M. (2016). Inquiry into the applications of communication theories in the field of sport: Instagram content analysis with a focus on Uses and gratifications theory. Communication Management in Sports Media, 3(4), 45-58.‎ (Persian)
32.Pérez, L., Puente, V., & Rodríguez, P. (2015). Are Broadcast Sporting Events of General Interest? A Regional Panel Data Analysis of TV Ratings for Spain's La Liga. Journal of Media Economics, 28(1), 7-19.
33.Pu, H., & James, J. (2017). The distant fan segment: Exploring motives and psychological connection of International National Basketball Association fans. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 18(4), 418-438.
34.Roberts, C. and Alpert, F. (2010), Total customer engagement: designing and aligning key strategic elements to achieve growth, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 19(3), 198-209.
35.Roberts, C., & Emmons, B. (2016). Twitter in the press box: How a new technology affects game-day routines of print-focused sports journalists. International Journal of Sport Communication, 9(1), 97-115.
36.Royo-Vela, M. & Casamassima, P. (2011), The influence of belonging to virtual brand communities on consumers’ affective commitment, satisfaction and word-of-mouth advertising The ZARA case, Online Information Review, 35(4), 517-542.
37.Raee'at,A; Zeini Zadeh, M; Emadi, S. (2015). Impact of Social Media Marketing: The Impact of whats App ‎status update on a sporting event of the academic program. Communication Management in Sports Media, 2(4), 38-46. (Persian)
38.Schultz, B., & Sheffer, M. L. (2008). Left behind: Local television and the community of sport. Western Journal of Communication, 72(2), 180-195.
39.Shao, G. (2009). Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: a uses and gratification perspective. Internet research, 19(1), 7-25.
40.Shapiro, S. L., Ridinger, L. L., & Trail, G. T. (2013). An analysis of multiple spectator consumption behaviors, identification, and future behavioral intentions within the context of a new college football program. Journal of Sport Management, 27(2), 130-145.
41.Smith, L. R., & Smith, K. D. (2012). Identity in Twitter’s hashtag culture: A sport-media-consumption case study. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5(4), 539-557.
42.Statista. (2019). Global digital population as of January 2019 (in millions). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/
43.Stavros, C., Meng, M. D., Westberg, K., & Farrelly, F. (2014). Understanding fan motivation for interacting on social media. Sport Management Review, 17(4), 455-469.
44.Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 558-564.
45.Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Company.
46.Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social psychology quarterly, 284-297.
47.Sutton, W. A., McDonald, M. A., Milne, G. R., & Cimperman, J. (1997). Creating and fostering fan identification in professional sports. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 6(1), 15-22.
48.Swanson, S., & Kent, A. (2017). Passion and pride in professional sports: Investigating the role of workplace emotion. Sport Management Review, 20(4), 352-364.
49.Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.). The social psychology of intergroup relations (33–48). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
50.Tang, T., & Cooper, R. (2017). The most social games: Predictors of social media uses during the 2016 Rio Olympics. Communication & Sport, 6(3), 308-330.
51.Thompson, A. J., Martin, A. J., Gee, S., & Geurin, A. N. (2017). Fans’ perceptions of professional tennis events’ social media presence: Interaction, insight, and brand anthropomorphism. Communication & Sport, 5(5), 579-603.
52.Tu, C. H. (2002). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-learning, 1(2), 34-45.
53.Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K.N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P. & Verhoef, P.C. (2010), “Customer engagement behavior: theoretical foundations and research directions”, Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 253-266.
54.Wakefield, K. (2016). Using fan passion to predict attendance, media consumption, and social media behaviors. Journal of Sport Management, 30(3), 229-247.
55.Wakefield, K. L. (1995). The pervasive effects of social influence on sporting event attendance. Journal of sport and social issues, 19(4), 335-351.
56.Wakefield, R., & Wakefield, K. (2016). Social media network behavior: A study of user passion and affect. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 25(2), 140-156.
 57.Wallace, L., Wilson, J., & Miloch, K. (2011). Sporting Facebook: A content analysis of NCAA organizational sport pages and Big 12 conference athletic department pages. International Journal of Sport Communication, 4(4), 422-444.
58.Webster, J. G. (2009). The role of structure in media choice. In T. Hartmann (Ed.), Media choice: A theoretical and empirical overview (221–233). New York, NY: Routledge.
59.Watkins, B., & Lee, J. W. (2016). Communicating Brand Identity on Social Media: A Case Study of the Use of Instagram and Twitter for Collegiate Athletic Branding. International Journal of Sport Communication, 9(4), 476-498.
60.Wharton, B. (2007). Reflections on the new fiesta nacional (ista); Soccer and society in modern Spain [1]. Soccer & Society, 8(4), 601–613.
61.Williams, J., & Chinn, S. J. (2010). Meeting relationship-marketing goals through social media: A conceptual model for sport marketers. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3(4), 422-437.
 
 
 
 
مدیریت ارتباطات در رسانه های ورزشی
دوره 7، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 26
دی 1398
صفحه 95-109
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 27 خرداد 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 08 مهر 1398
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 22 آذر 1398
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار