مدیریت ارتباطات در رسانه های ورزشی

با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن علمی مدیریت ورزشی ایران

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

استراتژی سبک رهبری توزیع شده بر بروز رفتار شهروندی سازمانی در سطح گروه با نقش میانجی احساس خودکارآمدی و اعتماد در سازمان: (مورد مطالعه‌ کارکنان رسانه‌های ورزشی در استان ایلام)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه ایلام. ایلام. ایران

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران

3 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان

چکیده

بررسی روابط بین استراتژی سبک‌رهبری توزیع شده، رفتار شهروندی‌سازمانی در سطح گروه، احساس خودکارآمدی و اعتماد در سازمان در قالب یک الگوی مفروض هدف پژوهش حاضر است. روش تحقیق توصیفی - همبستگی بود و جهت جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از روش پیمایش و چهار پرسشنامه(استاندارد و بومی سازی شده) روا و پایا استفاده شد. تمامی کارکنان رسانه‌های ورزشی در استان ایلام (N=136) جامعه آماری را تشکیل داد که با استفاده از جدول مورگان تعداد 103 نفر به شیوه نمونه‌گیری خوشه ای متناسب با حجم به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. جهت آزمون‌الگوی مفروض پژوهش از تحلیل مسیر بوسیله نرم افزار PLS VISUAL استفاده شد. رابطه بین سبک‌رهبری توزیع شده و رفتار شهروندی سازمانی در سطح گروه به صورت غیرمستقیم و از طریق دو متغیر احساس خودکارآمدی و اعتماد در سازمان به میزان 45/0 تبیین شده است. استراتژی سبک رهبری توزیع شده به عنوان بدیع‌ترین و متاخرترین استراتژی سبک رهبری پیش‌بینی کننده مناسبی برای بروز رفتارهای شهروندی در سطح گروه است که پیامد اولیه استراتژی سبک رهبری توزیع شده، تغییر در میزان اعتماد کارکنان و احساس خودکارآمدی آنهاست.این دو متغیر به عنوان میانجیگر، رابطه بین استراتژی رهبری توزیع‌شده و رفتارهای شهروندی در سطح گروه را تحت تاثیر قرار می دهند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Distributed Leadership Style Strategy on Organizational Citizenship Behavior at the Group Level with Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy and Trust in Organization (A Case Study of Sports Media Staff in Ilam Province)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Yasini 1
  • Yasra Panah 2
  • Ehsan Namdar Joyami 3

1 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Ilam University. Ilam

2 Student of Master of Education Management, Kharazmi University. Tehran

3 Ph.D. Student of Human Resource Management, University of Sistan and Baluchestan. Zahedan

چکیده [English]

The study of the relationship between distributed style style strategy, organizational citizenship behavior at group level, self-efficacy and trust in organization in the form of a hypothesized pattern. The research method was descriptive-correlational. For collecting data, a survey method and four valid and reliable questionnaires were used. The total staff of the sports media of Ilam province (N = 136) comprised a population that was selected by using a Morgan table of 103 people by random sampling in a proportional volume. In order to test the hypothesis of the research, the path analysis was performed using PLS VISUAL software. The relationship between distributed style and organizational citizenship behavior at the level of the group is indirect and through the two variables, the sense of self-efficacy and trust in the organization is explained at 45%. The strategy of distributed leadership style as the most innovative and recent style of leadership style is a good predictor of occurrence of citizenship behaviors at group level, which is the primary outcome of distributed leadership style strategy, change in employee trust and self-efficacy. These two variables As mediators, the relationship between distributed leadership strategy and citizenship behaviors affects the level of the group.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Distributed Leadership Style
  • Organizational Citizenship Behavior
  • Self-efficacy
  • Organizational Trust
مراجع
  1. Angelle, P. S. , Nixon, T. J. , Norton, E. M. , & Niles, C. A. (2011). Increasing organizational effectiveness: An examination of teacher leadership, collective efficacy, and trust in schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration.
  2. Asadi, A., & Rezaei Sufi, M. (2015). The role of advertising in the mass media on the purchase of sporting goods affecting weight loss: the point of view of physical education and non physical education girls students  Journal of communication management in sports media. 2 (7), 49-54. )Persian (
  3. Azadi, R.,  Yousefi, B., & Eidy, H. (2014). The role of media advertising to promote brand equity in the sports apparel industry  Journal of Communication Management in sports media. 2, (6), 66-75. )Persian(
  4. Bogler, R. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 277–289.
  5. Bryk, A. , & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage.
  6. Choi, J. N. , & Sy, T. (2010). Group-level organizational citizenship behavior: Effects of demographic faultlines and conflict in small work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 1032-1054. http:// dx. doi. org /10. 1002/job. 661
  7. Cox, J. F. , & Yan, M. L. (2007). Toward a model of shared leadership and distributed influence in the innovation process: How shared leadership can, International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7 (1), 3–26.
  8.  Crowther, F. , Kaagan, S. , Ferguson, M. , & Hann, L. (2002). Developing Teacher Leaders: How Teacher Leadership Enhances School Success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  9.  Crowther, F. , Kaagan, S. , Ferguson, M. , & Hann, L. (2002). Developing Teacher Leaders: How Teacher Leadership Enhances School Success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  10. Frase, L. (2001). Impact of school principal classroom presence in large inner city schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
  11. French, J. R. , & Caplan, R. D. (1972). Organizational stress and individual strain. The failure of success, 30, 66.
  12. Gronn, P (2002a) Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly. Vol 13. 423-451.
  13. Gronn, P. (2002b). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management and Administration, 28 (3), 317-338.
  14. Hackman, M. Z. , & Johnson, C. E. (2004). Leadership: a communication perspective. Sage Publications.
  15. Hallinger , P. Heck , R)2009) Assessing the Contribution of Distributed Leadership to School Improvement and Growth in Math Achievement. American Educational Research Journal. 46 (2) 659-689.
  16. Hallinger, P. & Heck, R (2003) Understanding the contribution of leadership to school improvement. In: M. WALLACE and L. POULSON (Eds) Learning to Read Critically in Educational Leadership and Management (London, Sage.
  17. Harris, A. (2004). Teacher Leadership as Distributed Leadership: heresy, fantasy or possibility?, School Leadership & Management,23 (3), 313–324.
  18. Harris, A. , & Muijs, D. (2003). Teacher leadership: Improvement through empowerment? An overview of the literature. Educational Management and Administration, 31, 437–448.
  19. Hay’s Group Education. (2004). The Five Pillars of Distributed Leadership in Schools: An investigation into the advantages and disadvantages, causes and constraints of a more distributed form of leadership in schools, NCSL.
  20. Hoy, W. K. , & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. (7th edition), New York: McGraw-Hill.
  21. Hoy, W. K. , Tarter, C. J. , & Bliss, J. R. (1990). Organizational climate, school health and effectiveness: A comparative analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 260–279.
  22. Huberman, A. M. & Vandenberghe, R. , (1999). Understanding and preventing teacher burnout: A sourcebook of international research and prac- tice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Hulpia, H. , Devos, G. , & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers' and teacher leaders' job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20 (3), 291-317.
  24. Humphreys, J. H. (2005). Contextual implications for transformational and servant leadership: A historical investigation. Management Decision, 43 (10), 1410-1431.
  25. Kandlousi, N. S. A. E. , Ali, A. J. , & Abdollahi, A. (2010). Organizational citizenship behavior in concern of communication satisfaction: The role of the formal and informal communication. International Journal of Business and Management, 5 (10), 51. ‏
  26. Katzenmeyer, M. & Moller, G. (1996). Awakening the sleeping giant. Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks, California.
  27. Kearney, E. , Gebert, D. , & Voelpel, S. C. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 581-598.
  28. Koh, W. L. , Steers, R. M. , & Terborg, J. R. (1995). The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16 (4), 319-333.
  29. Leithwood, K. Patten , S & Jantzi , D (2010) Testing a Conception of How School Leadership Influences Student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly. 46. 671-706.
  30. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 15 (2), 129-151.
  31. MacBeath, J. (2003). Distributed Leadership. Nottingham, UK: National College of School Leadership.
  32. Macbeath, J. (2005). Leadership as distributed: A matter of practice. School Leadership and Management, 25, 349–366.
  33. Mascall, B. , Leithwood, K. , Strauss, T. , & Sacks, R. (2008). The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ academic optimism. Journal of Educational Administration, 46, 214–228.
  34. Mathieu, J. E. , & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171–194.
  35. Mayrowetz, D. , Murphy, J. , Louis, K. S. , & Smylie, M. A. (2007). Distributed leadership as work redesign: Retrofitting the job characteristics model. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6 (1), 69-101.
  36. Miller, D. L. (2003). The stages of group development: A retrospective study of dynamic team processes. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 20, 121-134. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1111/j. 1936-4490. 2003. tb00698. x.
  37. Mitchell, C. & Sackney, L. (2000). Profound Improvement, Building Capacity for a Learning Community, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse. MO: University of Missouri.
  38. Nguni, S. , Sleegers, P. , & Denessen, E. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers’ job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: the Tanzanian case. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17, 145–177.
  39. Oduro, G. (2004). Distributed Leadership in Schools. Education Journal, 80, 13-34.
  40. Ogawa, R. T. (2005). Leadership as a social construct: the expression of human agency within organizational constraint. In F. ENGLISH )Eds. (The Sage Handbook of Educational Leadership: Advances in Theory, Research and Practice )Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage).
  41. Raymond, l. (2002). Bauman, Liquid Modernity and Dilemmas of Development, Thesis Eleven 70:15–25.
  42. Smylie, M. A. , Mayrowetz, D. , Murphy, J. , & Louis, K. S. (2007). Trust and the Development of Distributed Leadership. Journal of School leadership, 17 (4), 469-503.
  43. Somech, A. , & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2000). Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: The relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy, and teachers’ extra role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 649–659.
  44. Spillane, J. (2008). Distributed leadership in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
  45. Tao, M. , Takagi, H. , Ishida, M. , & Masuda, K. (1998). A study of antecedents of organizational commitment. Japanese Psychological Research, 40, 198–205.
  46. Vigoda-Gadot E, Beeri I, Birman-Shemesh T, Somech A. (2006). Group-Level Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the Education System: A Scale Reconstruction and Validation. Educational Administration Quarterly; 13 (4): 1-32.
  47. Yasini A, Zeinabadi HR, Navehebrahim AR, & Arasteh HR. (2013a). The effects of distributed leadership on job satisfaction and coomitment towards teaching. Public Management Journal. ; 12 (1): 129-148. )Persian(
  48. Yasini, A (2012). Distributed leadership and students' academic achievement. Ph. D thesis in educational administration. Kharazmi university, Tehran, Iran. )Persian(
  49. Yasini, A. (2011). Distributed leadership and GOCB of Teachers. Journal of organizational behavior in education. 1 (1): 5-18.)Persian(

مدیریت ارتباطات در رسانه های ورزشی
دوره 6، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 23
اردیبهشت 1398
صفحه 77-88
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 25 مرداد 1397
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 09 آذر 1397
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 16 آذر 1397
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار