با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن علمی مدیریت ورزشی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه مدیریت دولتی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

2 استاد گروه مدیریت دولتی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

3 کارشناس ارشد گروه مدیریت کارآفرینی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

4 دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت منابع انسانی گروه مدیریت دولتی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

5 دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت سیستم‌ها، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

چکیده

هدف از انجام این پژوهش بررسی رابطه وابستگی مشتری و نوآوری سازنده با توجه به نقش تعدیل‌کننده فرهنگ‌سازمانی در بین تولیدکنندگان اطلاعات ورزشی در شهر تهران است. پژوهش حاضر ازنظر هدف، از نوع کاربردی و برحسب نحوۀ گردآوری داده‌ها از نوع توصیفی- پیمایشی است. جامعۀ آماری این پژوهش شامل تولیدکنندگان اطلاعات ورزشی در شهر تهران است که جامعه موردبررسی در این پژوهش به‌طورکلی برابر با 480 تولیدکننده اطلاعات ورزشی است. روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای و تصادفی ساده است. حجم نمونه بر اساس جدول مورگان و فرمول کوکران با خطای 05/0 برابر با 213 نفر است. پایایی و روایی پرسش‌نامه‌های پژوهش با توجه به محقق ساخته بودن مجدداً بازازمایی و تأییدشده است. نرم‌افزار مورداستفاده در این پژوهش Smart Pls است. یافته‌ها حاکی از این مهم است که وابستگی مشتری با نوآوری سازنده رابطه منفی دارند و همین‌طور افزایش جهت‌گیری عملکرد و افزایش رقابت موجب افزایش نوآوری سازنده می‌شود. از طرفی جهت‌گیری عملکرد قوی‌تر، رابطه منفی وابستگی مشتری با نوآوری سازنده را قوی‌تر می‌کند و رقابت قوی‌تر، رابطه منفی وابستگی مشتری به نوآوری سازنده را کاهش می‌دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Survey Relationship Customer Dependency with Constructivist Innovation: the Role of Moderating Organizational Culture (Sports Media Manufacturer in the Metropolis of Tehran)

نویسندگان [English]

  • s r 1
  • n y 2
  • h sh 3
  • Ehsan Namdar Joyami 4
  • h p 5

1 Associate Prof. in Department of Management, Sistan and Baluchestan University, Zahedan, Iran

2 Prof. in Department of Management, Sistan and Baluchestan University, Zahedan, Iran

3 M.Sc. in Entrepreneurship Management, Sistan and Baluchestan University, Zahedan, Iran

4 Ph.D. Student in Human Resources Management, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

5 Ph.D. Student in Systems Management, Department of Management, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research is to investigate customer dependency and constructivist innovation considering the moderating role of organizational culture among sports information manufacturers in Tehran metropolis. All assumptions are confirmed. The present study is a descriptive-survey based on the purpose of the study. The statistical population of this study includes sport information producers in Tehran, which has a total population of 480 sports information producers in this study. The random cluster sampling method is simple. The sample size is based on Morgan's table and Cochran's formula with a 0.05 error of 213 people. Reliability and validity of the research questionnaire has been confirmed. The software used in this research is smart pls. Findings indicate that customer dependency has a negative relationship with constructive innovation, and also increasing the orientation of performance and increasing competition leads to increased constructive innovation. On the other hand, a stronger performance orientation will strengthen the negative relationship between customer affiliation and constructivist innovation, and stronger competition reduces the negative relationship between customer depndency and constructive innovation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Competition
  • Constructivist Inovation
  • Customer Dependency
  • Organizational Culture
  • Performance Orientation
  1. Abosag, I. Yeh, D. A.& Barnes, B. R. (2016). What is dark side about the dark-side ofbusiness relationships? Industrial Marketing Management, 55(May): 5–9.
  2. Asadi, A. Rezaei Sufi, M. (2015). The role of advertising in the mass media on the purchase of sporting goods affecting weight loss: the point of view of physical education and non physical education girls students . Journal of communication management in sports media. 2 (7), 49-54. (in Persian)
  3. Azadi, R; Yousefi, B; Eidy, H. (2014). The role of media advertising to promote brand equity in the sports apparel industry". Journal of Communication Management in sports media. 2, (6), 66-75. (in Persian)
  4. Atuahene-Gima, K. Slater, S. F.& Olson, E. M. (2005). The contingent value of responsive and proactive market orientations for new product program performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(6): 464–482.
  5. Bäck, I.&Kohtamäki, M. (2015). Boundaries of R & D collaboration. Technovation, 45-46,15–28.
  6. Baker, W. E.& Sinkula, J. M. (2007). Does market orientation facilitate balanced innovationprogram? An organizational learning perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(4):316–334.
  7. Büschgens, T. Bausch, A.&Balkin, D. B. (2013). Organizational culture and innovation:A meta-analytic review. Journal of Production Innovation Management, 30(4):763–781.
  8. Cha, H. S. Pingry, D. E.& Thatcher, M. E. (2008). Managing the knowledge supply chain:An organizational learning model of information technology offshore outsourcing.MIS Quarterly, 32(2): 281–306.
  9. Chen, Y. Lin, M. J.& Chang, C. (2009). The positive effects of relationship learning andabsorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrialmarkets. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(2):152–158.
  10. Choo, C. W. (2013). Information culture and organizational effectiveness. InternationalJournal of Information Management, 33(5): 775–779.
  11. Cowan, K. Paswan, C. K.& Van Steenburg, A. K. (2015). When inter-firm relationshipsmitigate power. Industrial Marketing Management, 48(July): 140–148.
  12. Dibbern, J. Goles, T. Hirschheim, R.&Jayatilaka, B. (2004). Information systemsoutsourcing: a survey and analysis of the literature. ACM SIGMIS Database: theDATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35(4): 6–102.
  13. Fisher, M. M. (2006). Innovation, knowledge creation, and systems of innovation.Innovation, networks, and knowledge spillovers: Selected essays (pp. 169–187). NewYork, NY: Springer.
  14. Furnari, S. (2016). Institutional fields as linked arenas: Inter-field resource dependence,institutional work and institutional change. Human Relations, 69(3), 551–580.
  15. Gassmann, O. Zeschky, M. Wolff, T.& Stahl, M. (2010). Crossing the industry- line:Breakthrough innovation through cross-Industry alliances with ‘Non- Suppliers’. LongRange Planning, 43(5-6): 639–654.
  16. Green, W.&Cluley, R. (2014). The field of radical innovation: Making sense of organizational cultures and radical innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(November):1343–1350.
  17. Hair, J. F. Black, W. C. Babin, B. J. Anderson, R. E.& Tatham, R. I. (2006). Multivariatedata analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  18. Hogan, S. J.&Coote, L. V. (2014). Organizational culture, innovation and performance:A test of Schein's model. Journal of Business Research, 67(8): 1609–1621.
  19. Husain, Z. Dayan, M.& Di Benedetto, C. A. (2016). The impact of networking oncompetitiveness via organizational learning, employee innovativeness, and innovationprocess: A mediation model. Journal of Engineering & Technology Management,40(April-June): 15–28.
  20. Janita, M. S.& Miranda, F. J. (2013). The antecedents of client loyalty in business-tobusiness (B2B) electronic marketplaces. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(5):814–823.
  21. Johnsen, R. E.& Lacoste, S. (2016). An exploration of the ‘dark side’ associationsofconflict, power and dependence in customer–supplier relationship. IndustrialMarketing Management, 59: 76–95 (November).
  22. Jugdev, K.& Müller, R. (2005). A retrospective look at our evolving understanding ofproject success. Project Management Journal, 36(4): 19–31.
  23. Kim, N.&Atuahene-Gima, K. (2010). Using exploratory and exploitative market learningfor new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(4):519–536.
  24. Lukas, B. A.& Ferrell, O. C. (2000). The effect of market orientation on product innovation.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2): 239–247.
  25. Mitręga, M.&Zolkiewski, J. (2012). Negative consequences of deep relationships withsuppliers: An exploratory study in Poland. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(July):886–894.
  26. Munksgaard, K. B. Johnsen, R. E.& Patterson, C. M. (2015). Knowing me, knowing you:Self- and collective interests in goal development in asymmetric relationships.Industrial Marketing Management, 48(July): 160–173.
  27. Nijssen, E. J. Hillebrand, B. de Jong, J. P. J. & Kemp, R. G. M. (2012). Strategic valueassessment and explorative learning opportunities with customers. Journal of ProductInnovation Management, 29(S1): 91–102.
  28. Nooteboom, B. De Jong, G. Vossen, R. W. Helper, S.&Sako, M. (2000). Network interactions and mutual dependence: A test in car industry. Industry & Innovation. 7(1):117–144.
  29. O'Reilly, C. (1989). Corporations, culture, and commitment: Motivation and social controlorganizations. California Management Review, 31(4): 9–25.
  30. O'Reilly, C. A. Chatman, J.& Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture:A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy ofManagement Journal, 34(3): 487–516.
  31. Palvia, P. C. King, R. C. Xia, W.&Palvia, S. C. J. (2010). Capability, quality, andperformance of offshore IS vendors: A theoretical framework and empirical investigation. Decision Sciences, 41(2):231–270.
  32. Paulraj, A. & Chen, I. J. (2007). Environmental uncertainty and strategic supply management: A resource dependence perspective and performance implications. Journalof Supply Chain Management, 43(3): 29–42.
  33. Saeed, S. Yousafzai, S. Paladino, A.& De Luca, L. M. (2015). Inside-out and outside-inorientations: A meta-analysis of orientation's effects on innovation and firm performance.Industrial Marketing Management, 47(May): 121–133.
  34. Sarros, J. C. Gray, J. Densten, I. L.& Cooper, B. (2005). The organizational cultureprofile revisited and revised: An Australian perspective. Australian Journal ofManagement, 30(1): 159–182.
  35. Şengün, A. E.&Wasti, S. N. (2007). Trust, control, and risk: A test of Das and Teng'sconceptual framework for pharmaceutical buyer-supplier relationships.Group& Organization Management, 32(4): 430–464.
  36. Sivadas, E.& Dwyer, F. R. (2000). An examination of organizational factors influencingnew product success in internal and alliance-based processes. Journal of Marketing,64(1): 31–49.
  37. Whetten, D. A. (2006). Albert &Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3): 219–234.
  38. Zhang, H. Wu, F.& Cui, A. (2015). Balancing market exploration and market exploitationin product innovation: A contingency perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(3): 297–308.