نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانشیارمدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
هدف این تحقیق، تعیین کدهای اخلاق داوری در مجله‌های علمی – پژوهشی تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی و بررسی میزان پایبندی داوران به آن کدها بود. روش این پژوهش از نوع پژوهش‌های اکتشافی و توصیفی است و از نوع مطالعات آمیخته (کمی و کیفی) است. بنابراین با توجه به هدف و فرآیند پژوهش؛ روش اجرای آن، پیمایشی و ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات، مصاحبه و پرسشنامه بود. پرسشنامه‌های این پژوهش مشتمل بر دو بخش کدهای اخلاق داوری در بعد ساختاری (شامل 14 گویه) و کدهای اخلاق داوری در بعد محتوایی (شامل 11 گویه) بود که برای تمامی اعضای هیأت تحریریه 27 مجله علمی- پژوهشی ارسال شد که تعداد این افراد 98 نفر بود. از آنجایی که تعداد جامعه تحقیق محدود و مشخص بود، نمونه آماری را برابر با جامعه آماری و به صورت کل شمار در نظر گرفتیم و پرسشنامه‌های عودت داده شده و قابل استفاده، 75 نسخه بود. پس از تعیین روایی و پایایی در مراحل قبل، پرسشنامه‌ها به منظور جمع‌آوری اطلاعات در اختیار پاسخگویان قرار گرفت. میزان پایبندی داوران به کدهای اخلاق داوری (بعد ساختاری) و (بعد محتوایی) در مجله‌های علمی – پژوهشی تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی ایران معنا‌دار است(001/0≥P). به نظر می‌رسد که اصول، ارزش‌ها و چارچوبی اخلاقی برای حرفه داوری مقاله-ها وجود دارد که رعایت آن کدهای اخلاقی قطعاً سلامت کاری و توسعه روزافزون را به فضای علمی و پژوهشی رشته تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی تزریق می‌نماید. از سوی دیگر، پایبندی داوران به اصول اخلاقی داوری نشریات تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی در سطح مطلوبی است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Investigating the obligation of reviewers of the scientific-research journals of Physical Education and Sport Sciences to ethical codes of reviewing
نویسنده [English]
- Habib Honari
Associate Professor of Sports Management, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
The purpose of this study was to determine the codes of refereeing ethics in the scientific-research journals of physical education and sports sciences and to examine the degree of adherence of referees to those codes. The method of this research is exploratory and descriptive research and is a mixed study (quantitative and qualitative). Therefore, according to the purpose and process of research; its method was survey and data collection tools were interviews and questionnaires. The research questionnaires consisted of two sections: codes of arbitration ethics in the structural dimension (including 14 items) and codes of judgment in the content dimension (including 11 items), which were sent to all members of the editorial board of 27 scientific-research journals. Was. Since the number of research population was limited and specific, we considered the statistical sample equal to the statistical population as a whole and the returned and usable questionnaires were 75 copies. he degree of adherence of judges to the codes of refereeing ethics (structural dimension) and (content dimension) in scientific-research journals of physical education and sports sciences of Iran is significant. It seems that there are principles, values and ethical framework for the article refereeing profession, the observance of which ethical codes will definitely inject work health and increasing development into the scientific and research environment of physical education and sports sciences. On the other hand, the adherence of the judges to the ethical principles of judging the publications of physical education and sports sciences is at a desirable level.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- obligation
- reviewers
- scientific-research journals
- physical education and sports sciences
- ethical codes of reviewing
Alidosti, S., Ayoubi Ardakan, M., Mirzaei, S. A., & Sheikh Shoaei, F. (2008). Investigating the status of the process of judging articles in prestigious Iranian scientific journals. Tehran: Research
Project of Information Science and Technology Research Institute. (Persian)
Badiegohar, R., & PourSoltani, H. (2019). Analysis of sport essays in Iranian Scientific and Developmental Journal. Communication Management in Sport Media, 6(4), 41-47. (Persian)
Benos, D. J., Kirk, K. L., & Hall, J. E. (2003). How to review a paper. Advances in Physiology Education, 27(2), 47-52.
Ershad, F., Qarakhani, M., & Mirzaei, S. A. (2004). Analysis of arbitration documents Iranian Journal of Sociology. Iranian Journal of Sociology, (3), 1- 31.
Fernando, M., & Chowdhury, R. (2010). The relationship between spiritual well-being and ethical orientations in decision making: With business executives in Australia. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 211-225.
Friedman, D. P. (1995). Manuscript peer review at the AJR: Facts, figures, and quality assessment. American Journal of Roentgenology, 164(4), 1007-1009.
Gaus, G. F. (2001). What is deontology? Part two: Reasons to act. Journal of Value Inquiry, 35, 179- 193.
Giraud, C. L. (2006). Achievement goal orientations and moral functioning in elite athletes (Doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minnesota, Washington.
Gordon, M. D. (1980). The role of referees in scientific communication, selected readings. New York: Nichols Publishing CO. Iranian Association of Ethics in Science and Technology (Bita). (2009). Ethical principles of the Iranian Association of Ethics in Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.iranethics.ir/find1.100.58.fa.html (Persian)
Khasseh, A., Barangi, H., & Khasseh, A. (2017). Analysis of content of international research in the field of sports media by network analysis and software visualization. Communication Management in Sport Media, 4(4), 53-61. (Persian)
Khaleghi, N. (2008) Ethics of research in the field of social sciences. Ethics in Science and Technology, 3(2-1), 83-92. (Persian)
Kian Pour, M., & Hejazi, G. (2004). The fall of scientific ethics. Journal of Science and the Future, 9, 1-20. (Persian)
Kliewere, M. A., Freed, K. S., Delong, D. M., Pickhardt, P. J., & Provenzale, J. M. (2005). Reviewing the reviewers: Comparison of Review Quality and reviewer characteristics. American Journal of Roentgenology, 184, 1731-1735.
Lee, F., Monaghan., O., & Dwyer, M. (2013). Seeking University Research Ethics Committee approval: The emotional vicissitudes of a rationalized process. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(1), 60-85.
Lee, M. J., Whitehead, J., & Ntoumanis, N. (2007). Development of the Attitudes to Moral DecisionMaking in Youth Sport Questionnaire (AMDYSQ). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 369-392.
MacInnis, D. (2003). Responsibilities of a good reviewer: Lessons learned from Kindergarten. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 344-355.
Mahmoudi Kia, M., Baharloo, M., & Arshadi, N. (2014). Relationship between personality traits and moral leadership. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 9(3), 1-10. (Persian)
Mirzaei, S. A., Ayoubi Ardakan, M., Qarakhani, M., & Sheikh Shoaei, F. (2006). Peer reading in scientific journals: A case study of Iranian Journal of Sociology. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 3, 1-33. (Persian)
Moore, G. (1903). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Brown, R. P., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., Antes, A. L., .., & Devenport, L. D. (2007). Ethics training for scientists. Effects on Ethical decision- making. Ethics Behaviour, 19(5), 379-402.
Nastaran Borujeni, I., Asadi, H., & Nasiri, Kh. (2016). Assessing the adherence of graduate students in the field of physical education to the principles of research ethics in Tehran universities. Journal of Sport Management, 8(5), 655-664. (Persian)
Nylenna, M., Riis, P., & Karlsson, Y. (1994). Multiple blinded reviews of the same twomanuscripts: Effects of referee characteristics and publication language. JAMA, 272(2), 149-151.
Polak, J. F. (1995). The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process. American Journal of Roentgenol, 165, 685-688.
Provenzale, J. M., & Robert, J. S. (2006). A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 34(2), 92-99.
Qasemzadeh, N., Nick Ravanfard, N., Rahimi Rad, M. H., Mousavipour, S., & Faramarzi Razini, F. (2013). The level of observance of ethics standards in research in research projects approved by Urmia University of Medical Sciences during the years 2003-2008. Iranian Journal of Medical Ethics and History, 6(2), 55- 67. (Persian)
Reits, J. M. (2000). ODLIS: Online Dictionary of Library and Information Science. Retrieved 2005, Jan 20, from www.WCSU.End/ Library/odlis.html
Rooyen, S. (2001). The evaluation of peer review quality. Learned Publishing, 14(2), 85-91.
Steig, M. F. (1983). Refereeing and the editorial process: The AHR and Webb. Scholarly Publishing, 14(2), 99-122.
Vaddahir, A. A., Farhoud, D., Ghazi Tabatabai, M., & Tavassoli, Gh. (2008). Standards of ethical behavior in the conduct of scientific work. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 3(3&4), 6-17. (Persian)
Weller, A. C. (2001). Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses. Silver Spring, MD: American Society for Information Science and Technology.
Williamson, A. (2003). What will happen to peerreview? Learned Publishing, 16(1), 15-20.
)