با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن علمی مدیریت ورزشی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه مدیریت ورزشی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاداسلامی، کرج، ایران.

2 استاد گروه مدیریت ورزشی، واحد کرج،دانشگاه آزاداسلامی کرج، ایران.

3 استاد گروه مدیریت ورزشی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی، کرج ، ایران.

4 استاد گروه مدیریت ورزشی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج ، ایران.

چکیده

امروزه فناوری اطلاعات به عنوان محور تشکیل جوامع اطلاعاتی مورد توجه اکثر کشورهای جهان قرار گرفته است. مدیریت دانش و نقش رهبری به فرایند مبادله اطلاعات سرعت می بخشد. هدف تحقیق بررسی نقش میانجی فناوری اطلاعات در رابطه بین سبک های رهبری با مدیریت دانش کارکنان با رویکرد مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری است. روش تحقیق از نوع توصیفی- همبستگی و به شکل میدانی انجام شده است.جامعه آماری پژوهش را کارکنان ادارات کل ورزش و جوانان شمال غرب ایران تشکیل داد. به منظور انجام نمونه گیری با توجه به وجود 3 استان از روش تصادفی طبقه ای نسبتی استفاده شد. و بر اساس تعداد گویه‌ها و متغیرها حداقل حجم نمونه 365 نفردر نظر گرفته شد. سه پرسشنامه سبک رهبری باس و اولیو (2003)، مدیریت دانش فیلیوس و همکاران (2000) و فناوری اطلاعات نیک پی و همکاران( 2019) ابزار اندازه گیری تحقیق را تشکیل دادند. . جهت بررسی روایی محتوایی پرسشنامه ها از اساتید مدیریت ورزشی و خبرگان آگاه به موضوع و برای بررسی پایایی از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شد. برای تحلیل آمار توصیفی و ضرایب همبستگی از نرم افزار23 SPSS و برای بررسی برازش داده ها و ارزیابی مدل شامل بررسی اعتبار همگرا، اعتبار تشخیصی و پایایی مرکب از نرم افزار AMOS24 و جهت ارائه الگو از نرم افزار SMART-PLS3 استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد در روابط بین سبک‌های رهبری و مدیریت دانش، پذیرش فناوری اطلاعات به عنوان نقش میانجی عمل می‌کند. لذا پیشنهاد می‌شود فرآیند پذیرش فناوری اطلاعات کارکنان بر مبنای مدیریت دانش و سبک های رهبری باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Knowledge Designing a Causal Model of The Relationship Between Leadership Styles &

نویسندگان [English]

  • ebrahim nikpey motlag bonab 1
  • Hossein Sepasi 2
  • Parivash Nourbakhsh 3
  • Mahvash Noorbakhsh 4

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Sport Management, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

2 Prof. , Department of Sport Management, Karaj Branch,, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.

3 Prof. , Department of Sport Management, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Karaj, Iran.

4 Prof. , Department of Sport Management, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Karaj, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Today, information technology (IT) as the axis of the formation of information societies has been considered by most countries in the world. Knowledge management and leadership role speed up the information exchange process. The purpose of study is to investigate the mediating role of information technology in relationship between leadership styles and employee knowledge management with a structural equation modeling approach. The research method is descriptive-correlational and it is done in field. The statistical population consisted of employees of the Departments of Sports and Youth of Northwestern Iran. In order to perform sampling, due to the existence of 3 provinces, the relative stratified random method was used. Based on number of items and variables, minimum sample size of 365 people was considered.Three questionnaires of leadership style of Bass and Olivo (2003), knowledge management of Filius et al. (2000) and IT of Nickpey et al. (2019) consisted research instruments. To evaluate content validity of the questionnaires, sports management professors and experts and to evaluate reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used. SPSS 23 software was used to analyze descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients, and AMOS24 software was used to evaluate data fit and model evaluation, including convergent validity, diagnostic validity and composite reliability. SMART-PLS3 software was used to provide a model.Rresults showed that in relationship between leadership styles and knowledge management, IT acceptance acts as a role of mediator. Therefore, it is suggested that the information technology acceptance process of the employees be based on knowledge management and leadership styles.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • IT
  • Leadership Style
  • Modeling
  • Knowledge Management
  1. Afrazeh, A., Barch, H., Najafi, A. (2003). “Decision support system to measure and provide appropriate solutions to improve the productivity of human resources”. Third National Conference on Industrial Engineering, Tehran, Iran Industrial Engineering Association, Amir Kabir University of Technology. (Persian)
  2. Angeline, S., Sudha, S. (2015). “The important of leadership styles in information technology organizations”. International Journal of Applied Business and Economy Research, 19 (40), 1675-1681.
  3. Anser, M. K., Yousaf, Z., Usman, M., Yousaf, S. (2020). “Towards strategic businessperformance of the hospitality sector: Nexus of ICT, E-Marketing and Organizational Readiness”. Sustainability, 12, 1-17.

4.       Bakhsh Alipour, V., KhodaparastSarshake, S.,  Rezaei Sufi, M. (2020). Relationship between the use of information and communication technology indicators with the components of empowerment of sports teachers in the Ministry of Education. Communication Management in Sports Media (Scientific), 8(29), xx-xx, In Print. (Persian).

  1. Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. L., Berson, Y. (2003). “Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 (4), 695-702.
  2. Bass, B. M., &Avolio, B. J. (2004). “Multifactor leadership questionnaire”: Manual and sampler set. 3rd ed. Mind Garden Inc.
  3. Bass, B. M., Riggio, R. E. (2006). “Transformational leadership”. 2nd ed. Psychological Press, N. J. Lawrence Erlbaum Association, Inc. p. 39.
  4. Bent, D., Bennet, A. (2003). “The rise of the knowledge organization”. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer- Verlag. P. 28
  5. Crawford, C. B. (2005). “Effects of transformational leadership and organizational position on knowledge management”. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9 (6), 6-16.
  6. Chester, Y. (2007). “A model of buyer behavior relating to the sponsorship of major sporting events in Australia”. PHD, Faculty of Business and Enterprise Swinburne University of Technology.
  7. Davenport, T. H., Delong, D. W., Beers, M. C. (2000). “Successful knowledge management project”. Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 43-57.
  8. Davis, F. D. (1989). “Perceived usefulness, perceived case of use, and user acceptance of information technology”. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319-339.
  9. Filius, R., De Long, J., Roelofs, E. (2000). “Knowledge management in the HRD office”. Journal of Work Place Learning, 12(7), 286-295.
  10. Fornell, C and Larcker, D. F. (1981). “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”, Journal of Marketing Research, 1, 39-50.
  11. Gal, M., Borg, W., Gall, J. (2001). “Quantitative and qualitative research methods in educational sciences and psychology” (Volume I)". Translated by Ahmad Reza Nasr et al. (2017). Tehran: Samat Publications. (Persian).
  12. Garson, G. D. (2016). “Partial least squares: Regression & structural equation models”. School of public & International Affairs North Carolina State University.
  13. Gencer, M. S., Samur, Y. (2016). Leadership styles and technology: Leadership competency level of educational leaders.Social and Behavioral Sciences 229, 226 – 233.
  14. Goh, S. (2002). “Managing effective knowledge transfer”. Journal of knowledge Management, 6(1), 23-31.
  15. Hassanzadeh, R., SeyedAbbaszadeh, M. M., Qalavandi, H. (1393). “Study of the relationship between knowledge management and human resource improvement from the perspective of administrative staff of Uromia University". University Library and Information Research, 48(4), 621-605. (Persian)
  16. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). “Partial least squares Structural equation modeling (PLS- SEM): An emerging tool in business research”. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
  17. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. (2015). “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
  18. Latham, J. R. (2014). “Leadership for quality and innovation: Challenges, theories, and a framework for future research”. Quality Management Journal, 21(1), 11-15.
  19. Lopez, S. P., Vidal, J. A. (2012). “Information technology competency, knowledge processes and firm performance”. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(4), 644-662.
  20. Malcom, D. B. (2017). “Leadership in information technology: Leadership theories, Leadership in information technology: Leadership theories, perspectives and ethical dilemmas perspectives and ethical dilemmas”. The Siegel Institute Journal of Applied Ethics, 2(1), 1-19.
  21. Mirsafarian, H. R. (2016). “Study of the relationship between managers 'transformational leadership style and employees' entrepreneurial behaviors”. Journal of Applied Research in Sports Management, 4(16), 35-41. (Persian)
  22. Mirzaei, I., Mirzaei M., Zare, A. (2016). “Study of barriers to the use of information technology in physical education (Case study: deprived areas of the country)”. Journal of Applied Research in Sports Management, 4(15), 123-133. (Persian)
  23. Moffett, S., McAdam, R. and Parkinson, S. (2008). “An empirical analysis of knowledge management applications”. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23 3), 6-26.
  24. Musa Khani, M., Hassan Gholipour, T., Vazifeh, Z. (2013). “Presenting a model to explain the relationship between knowledge management processes and human resource development in higher education”. Public Management Research, 6(22), 49-70. (Persian)
  25. NamdarJoymi, E., Roshan, S. A., Yaqubi, N. M. (2020). “The role of new knowledge management processes in the strategy of sustainable competitive advantage (Case study, Sports media staff in Isfahan Province)”. Communication Management in Sports Media, 7(4), 15-30. (Persian)
  26. Nikpey, I., Sepasi, H., Nourbakhsh, P., Noorbakhsh, M. (2019). “Presenting a model of leadership style and knowledge management through the mediation of IT acceptance in the employees of the General Departments of Sports and Youth of the Northwestern Provinces of the country”.PhD Dissertation, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, College of Physical Education. (Persian)
  27. Politis, J. D. (2001). “The relationship of various leadership styles to knowledge management”. The Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 22(8), 354-364.
  28. Preacher, K. J., & Coffman, D. L. (2006). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org/.
  29. Rezaei, M. (2010). “Common theories about the acceptance of information and communication technology”. Quarterly Journal of Communication Research, 16(4), 63-69. (Persian)
  30. Schepers, J., Wetzels, M., De Ruyter, K. (2005). “Leadership styles in technology acceptance”. Managing Service Quality, 15(6), 496-508.
  31. Ugwu, C. I., Okore, A. M. (2019). Transformational and transactional leadership influence on knowledge management activities of librarians in university libraries in Nigeri.Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 16, 864-879.
  32. Young, A. G. & Pearce, S. (2013). “A beginner's guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis .Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79-94.
  33. Yukl, G. (2002). “Leadership in organizations”, 5th ed. Prentice-Hall, New York.