بررسی میزان پایبندی داوران مجله‌های علمی – پژوهشی تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی به کدهای اخلاق داوری

Abui Ardakan, M., Mirzaei, S. A., & Sheikh Shoaei, F. (2012). The process of judging articles in Iranian scientific journals. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 28(2), 305-346. (Persian)
Alidosti, S., Ayoubi Ardakan, M., Mirzaei, S. A., & Sheikh Shoaei, F. (2008). Investigating the status of the process of judging articles in prestigious Iranian scientific journals. Tehran: Research
Project of Information Science and Technology Research Institute. (Persian)
Badiegohar, R., & PourSoltani, H. (2019). Analysis of sport essays in Iranian Scientific and Developmental Journal. Communication Management in Sport Media, 6(4), 41-47. (Persian)
Benos, D. J., Kirk, K. L., & Hall, J. E. (2003). How to review a paper. Advances in Physiology Education, 27(2), 47-52.
Ershad, F., Qarakhani, M., & Mirzaei, S. A. (2004). Analysis of arbitration documents Iranian Journal of Sociology. Iranian Journal of Sociology, (3), 1- 31.
Fernando, M., & Chowdhury, R. (2010). The relationship between spiritual well-being and ethical orientations in decision making: With business executives in Australia. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 211-225.
Friedman, D. P. (1995). Manuscript peer review at the AJR: Facts, figures, and quality assessment. American Journal of Roentgenology, 164(4), 1007-1009.
Gaus, G. F. (2001). What is deontology? Part two: Reasons to act. Journal of Value Inquiry, 35, 179- 193.
Giraud, C. L. (2006). Achievement goal orientations and moral functioning in elite athletes (Doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minnesota, Washington.
Gordon, M. D. (1980). The role of referees in scientific communication, selected readings. New York: Nichols Publishing CO.   Iranian Association of Ethics in Science and Technology (Bita). (2009). Ethical principles of the Iranian Association of Ethics in Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.iranethics.ir/find1.100.58.fa.html (Persian)
Khasseh, A., Barangi, H., & Khasseh, A. (2017). Analysis of content of international research in the field of sports media by network analysis and software visualization. Communication Management in Sport Media, 4(4), 53-61. (Persian)
Khaleghi, N. (2008) Ethics of research in the field of social sciences. Ethics in Science and Technology, 3(2-1), 83-92. (Persian)
Kian Pour, M., & Hejazi, G. (2004). The fall of scientific ethics. Journal of Science and the Future, 9, 1-20. (Persian)
Kliewere, M. A., Freed, K. S., Delong, D. M., Pickhardt, P. J., & Provenzale, J. M. (2005). Reviewing the reviewers: Comparison of Review Quality and reviewer characteristics. American Journal of Roentgenology, 184, 1731-1735.
Lee, F., Monaghan., O., & Dwyer, M. (2013). Seeking University Research Ethics Committee approval: The emotional vicissitudes of a rationalized process. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(1), 60-85.
Lee, M. J., Whitehead, J., & Ntoumanis, N. (2007). Development of the Attitudes to Moral DecisionMaking in Youth Sport Questionnaire (AMDYSQ). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 369-392.
MacInnis, D. (2003). Responsibilities of a good reviewer: Lessons learned from Kindergarten. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 344-355.
Mahmoudi Kia, M., Baharloo, M., & Arshadi, N. (2014). Relationship between personality traits and moral leadership. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 9(3), 1-10. (Persian)
Mirzaei, S. A., Ayoubi Ardakan, M., Qarakhani, M., & Sheikh Shoaei, F. (2006). Peer reading in scientific journals: A case study of Iranian Journal of Sociology. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 3, 1-33. (Persian)
Moore, G. (1903). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.                                                                                Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Brown, R. P., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., Antes, A. L., .., & Devenport, L. D. (2007). Ethics training for scientists. Effects on Ethical decision- making. Ethics Behaviour, 19(5), 379-402.
Nastaran Borujeni, I., Asadi, H., & Nasiri, Kh. (2016). Assessing the adherence of graduate students in the field of physical education to the principles of research ethics in Tehran universities. Journal of Sport Management, 8(5), 655-664. (Persian)
Nylenna, M., Riis, P., & Karlsson, Y. (1994). Multiple blinded reviews of the same twomanuscripts: Effects of referee characteristics and publication language. JAMA, 272(2), 149-151.
Polak, J. F. (1995). The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process. American Journal of Roentgenol, 165, 685-688.
Provenzale, J. M., & Robert, J. S. (2006). A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 34(2), 92-99.
Qasemzadeh, N., Nick Ravanfard, N., Rahimi Rad, M. H., Mousavipour, S., & Faramarzi Razini, F. (2013). The level of observance of ethics standards in research in research projects approved by Urmia University of Medical Sciences during the years 2003-2008. Iranian Journal of Medical Ethics and History, 6(2), 55- 67. (Persian)
Reits, J. M. (2000). ODLIS: Online Dictionary of Library and Information Science. Retrieved 2005, Jan 20, from www.WCSU.End/ Library/odlis.html
Rooyen, S. (2001). The evaluation of peer review quality. Learned Publishing, 14(2), 85-91.
Steig, M. F. (1983). Refereeing and the editorial process: The AHR and Webb. Scholarly Publishing, 14(2), 99-122.
Vaddahir, A. A., Farhoud, D., Ghazi Tabatabai, M., & Tavassoli, Gh. (2008). Standards of ethical behavior in the conduct of scientific work. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 3(3&4), 6-17. (Persian)
Weller, A. C. (2001). Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses. Silver Spring, MD: American Society for Information Science and Technology.
Williamson, A. (2003). What will happen to peerreview? Learned Publishing, 16(1), 15-20.