نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.
2 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، پژوهشگاه تربیتبدنی و علوم ورزشی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر روان‌سنجی پرسش‌نامۀ سواد ارتباطی در دانشجویان تربیتبدنی دانشگاه پیام نور کشور بود. روش پژوهش توصیفی-پیمایشی، از نظر هدف، توسعه‌ای و به‌صورت میدانی انجام شد. دانشجویان مقطع کارشناسی تربیتبدنی دانشگاه پیام نور کشور (99-1398) جامعۀ آماری را تشکیل دادند و 250 نفر به‌عنوان نمونه و به صورت غیرتصادفی دردسترس، ابزار پژوهش را تکمیل کردند. برای جمع‌آوری اطلاعات از پرسشنامة محقق‌ساخته درباره مؤلفه ها و شاخص های سواد ارتباطی استفاده شد. روایی سازه پرسشنامه از طریق تحلیل عامل تأییدی مراحل اول و دوم و بررسی روایی همگرا و واگرا و پایایی آن از طریق ضریب آلفای کرونباخ بررسی شد. انواع شاخص‌های برازندگی (مطلق، تطبیقی، مقتصد) نیز برازش مدل را تأیید کردند. یافته ها نشان داد که سواد ارتباطی از طریق سه سازه «حسی، تخصصی و سطح ارتباطی» قابل‌اندازه‌گیری است. سازة حسی با پنج شاخص مهارت های «نگاه‌کردن، گوش‌کردن، شامه، ذائقهسنجی و لمس‌کردن» قابل‌سنجش است. سازة تخصصی با مهارت های پانزدهگانه «سخن‌گفتن، نوشتن، زبان‌تنی، خواندن، کار با فناوری های ارتباطی، سواد بین فرهنگی، سواد تبلیغات، سواد حقوق شهروندی، ارتباط سازمانی، روابط عمومی، روابط بین الملل، هوش هیجانی، مالی، تجاری و پژوهش ارتباطی» قابل‌ارزیابی است. سازة سطح ارتباطی نیز با پنج شاخص مهارت های ارتباطی «درون‌فردی، بین‌فردی، گروهی، جمعی و فرافردی» قابل‌اندازه‌گیری است. براساس نتایج می‌توان گفت که پرسشنامه سواد ارتباطی ابزاری کارآمد برای بررسی سطوح ارتباطی دانشجویان کارشناسی تربیتبدنی با توجه به ماهیت گروهی رشته تربیتبدنی است که می‌توان با آموزش‌های لازم موجب بهبود و توسعه درک و فهم شیوه‌های مختلف ارتباطی در جامعه مدنظر شد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Psychometrics of Communication Literacy Questionnaire in Physical Education Students of Payame Noor University
نویسندگان [English]
- Hamid Ghasemi 1
- nazanin rasekh 2
1 Associate Prof. in Department of Sport Management, Payam Noor, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Prof. in Department of Sport Management, Sport Sciences Research Institute, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
The aim of the psychometric research was to assess the communication literacy questionnaire among physical education students at Payame Noor University. The research was conducted using a descriptive-survey method, with a developmental objective, and in a field setting. The statistical population consisted of undergraduate physical education students at Payame Noor University (99-98), and a sample of 250 individuals completed the research tool in a non-random accessible manner. A researcher-made questionnaire about the components and indicators of communication literacy was used to collect the data. The validity of the questionnaire structure was confirmed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and its convergent and discriminant validity, as well as reliability, were assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and various fit indices (absolute, relative, and parsimonious). The findings indicated that communication literacy is measurable through three constructs: "sensory, specialized, and relational levels." The sensory construct is measurable with five skill indicators: "observation, listening, smelling, tasting, and touching." The specialized construct is assessable with fifteen skills: "speaking, writing, body language, reading, working with communication technologies, intercultural literacy, advertising literacy, civic literacy, organizational communication, public relations, international relations, emotional intelligence, financial, commercial, and communication research." The relational level construct is also measurable with five communication skill indicators: "intrapersonal, interpersonal, group, public, and transpersonal." Ultimately, it can be concluded that the communication literacy questionnaire is an effective tool for assessing the communication levels of undergraduate physical education students, considering the group nature of the physical education field. With the necessary training, it can lead to improving and developing the understanding and comprehension of various communication methods within the targeted community.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Confirmatory Factor Analysis
- Dimension of Communication Levels
- Sensory Skills
- Specialized Communication Skills
- Validation
- Adu-Oppong, A. A., & Agyin-Birikorang, E. (2014). Communication in the workplace: Guidelines for improving effectiveness. Global Journal of Commerce and Management Perspective, 3(5), 208-213.
- Ansari, M. (2019). Investigating the Relationship between social media use and employee efficiency with the mediating role of communication literacy from the perspective of principals of first secondary schools in Mamasani county (Unpublished master's thesis). Islamic Azad University, Noorabad Mamasani Branch. (In Persian)
- Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Second Ed. New York, London. Guilford Press Publications.
- Caliskan N. (2003). Evaluation of classroom teachers of nonverbal communication behavior (Unpublished master's thesis). Ataturk University.
- Davoodi, A., & Rezazadeh, A. (2013). Structural equation modeling with PLS software. Tehran: University Jihad Publishing Organization. (In Persian)
- Detlor, B., Julien, H., & Serenko, A., Booker, L. (2011). Factors affecting student learning outcomes of information literacy instruction. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-2.
- Farhangi, A., Safarzadeh, H., & Khademi, M. (2004). Theories of organizational communication (First Edition). Tehran: Rasa Cultural Services Institute. (In Persian)
- Gee, J. (2007). Good video games and good learning: Collected essays on video games, learning and literacy. New York: Peter Lang
- Ghasemi, H., & Rasekh, N. (2020a). Identifying dimensions of communication literacy: Thematic analysis approach. Journal of Health Literacy, 4(4), 18-29.
- Ghasemi, H., Rasekh, N. (2020b). Psychometrics of the Qasemi’s Seven-Module Communication Skills Questionnaire. Sport Psychology Studies, 8(30), 23-40. (In Persian)
- Ghasemi, H., Rasekh, N., & Izadparast, L. (2020). Communication Literacy. Tehran: Andisheh Ara. (In Persian)
- Ghorbani, M., Niusha, B., Shaterian, F. (2017). Constructing and Standardizing of Media Literacy Assessment Questionnaire for Youth in Tehran. Communication Research, 23(88), 73-98.
- Hooman, H. (2016). Structural equation modeling using LISREL software. Seventh Edition, Tehran: Samat Publications. (In Persian)
- Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55
- Kidd, D., & Castano, E. (2016, August 8). Different Stories: How Levels of Familiarity WithLiterary and Genre Fiction Relate to Mentalizing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and theArts. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000069Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford publications.
- Lee, T., Lee, B. K., & Lee-Geiller, S. (2020). The effects of information literacy on trust in government websites: Evidence from an online experiment. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 102098.
- Mahmoodi, F., Samadi, Z., & Fizolahzadeh, Z. (2017). Psychometric Properties of Interpersonal Communication skills Questionnaire (ISAQ) from the viewpoint of students at Tabriz University and Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Journal of Medical Education Development, 9 (24), 72-84. (In Persian)
- Mansy, D. (2015). Multiple literacies: An alternative or beyond friere. In J.Anderson, T. Rogers, M. Kendrick, & S. smythe (Eds.), portraits of literacy across families. Communities. And school: intersections and tensions (71-84). Mahwah, Nj: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.
- Mery, Y., Newby, J., & Peng, K. (2011). Assessing the reliability and validity of locally developed information literacy test items. Reference Services Review, 39(1), 98-122
- Mishra, S. K., & Mishra, P. (2020). Functional Aspects of Communication Skills for Professional Empowerment. Journal of English Language and Literature (JOELL), 7(1), 79-85.
- Pereira, T. J., & Puggina, A. C. (2017). Validation of the self-assessment of communication skills and professionalism for nurses. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 70(3), 588-594.
- Prat, G., Casas-Anguera, E., Garcia-Franco, M., Escandell, M. J., Martin, J. R., Vilamala, S., & Ochoa, S. (2014). Validation of the Communication Skills Questionnaire (CSQ) in people with schizophrenia. Psychiatry research, 220(1-2), 646-653.
- Raptou, E. (2020). Communication Literacy in Undergraduate Studies of Tertiary Education in Greece. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2020.1.1.9
- Sommer, M., Kohnen, A. M., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Hampton, J. (2021). Investigation of the Validity Evidence of the Information Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale (ILSES) Among Undergraduate Students. Communications in Information Literacy, 15 (1), 1–23.
- texas tech university. (2020). communication literacy requirement. Available at: https://www.depts.ttu.edu/provost/curriculum/communication-literacy/index.php
- Toups, M. (2020). Review: Learning beyond the classroom: Engaging students in information literacy through co-curricular activities. Communications in Information Literacy, 14 (2), 395–399.
- (2013). literacy as freedom. A UNESCO round table. Paris: UNESCO
- , T. W. (2015). Communication skills, students coursebook. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303893422
- Yazdani, F. (2012). Designing an instrument for assessing the students’ information literacy at Payam-e-Noor University. Information and Communication Technology in Educational S ciences, 2(4), 29-52. (In Persian)
)